UN Web Site    |   UN Web Site Locator  
  Printer Friendly  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us
 
HOME MANDATE RETHINKING GROWH ECO-EFFICIENCY   POLICIES AND INSTRUMENTS
PARTNERS AND LINKS

Access presentations from the 3rd Green Growth Policy Dialogue

RELATED NEWS

 


Google GreenGrowth

Recent Publications
Green Growth at a Glance

The Fifth Ministerial COnference on Environment and Development

Recent Compilations

Click to read resources

Click to read resources
Click to read resources


Page 4 of 7 <<

border

One Planet Living to construct villages that exist within Earth's carrying capacity
Souce: One Planet Living

earth

One Planet Living will be an important concept for China to embrace as it prospers. On average, the 1.3 billion Chinese citizens - 20% of the world's human population - are consuming no more than their fair share of the planets resources. Chinese people are therefore living at a one planet level.

But this average conceals a trend of increasing consumption, especially in the cities which have been following the unsustainable western development model in recent years. This has led to increased impacts such that the average person in Shanghai has a larger ecological footprint than the average Londoner. China's economy is booming and as a direct result of this 50% of the world's construction is expected to take place in China in the next fifteen years.

The Chinese government has recognised the burden that this development could place on scarce resources and is actively seeking more sustainable solutions. In September 2005 we were pleased to show the Chinese Minister of Construction Wang Guang Tao around the BedZED eco-village where BioRegional's offices are based in south London, UK. The Minister saw for himself the solutions we have developed for sustainable living and pledged his support for One Planet Living in China.

 

 

 

BioRegional and WWF met with staff at the Ministry of Construction and the State Environmental Protection Agency in Beijing and have agreed to work together to introduce One Planet Living ideas and technologies to China.

Xiao Hong Chen, a Chinese civil engineer, joined the BioRegional team in October 2005 to start work on implementing a One Planet Living Community in at least one location in China. Since then we have visited sites and talked to potential developers and government partners in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou.

In Guangzhou, the largest city in south China, China Merchant Property Developers (CMPD) has a mixed use site for 20,000 people in the Panyu district. China Merchant has a track record in sustainable construction, achieving the first LEED silver certification for a commercial building in China in 2005 and organising a series of green building conferences in recent years. In February 2006, China Merchant visited BedZED with the Mayor of Panyu.

 

In May 2006 BioRegional ran very successful workshops with CMPD where together with DHV engineers, WWF China and other stakeholders we developed a One Planet Living Sustainability Action Plan for the Panyu Jin Shan project. The project is currently seeking final planning permission and if approved could become the first One Planet Living Community in China.

The government of Shanghai Pudong, which has seen most of Shanghai's growth in the last sixteen years, is now giving priority to environmental development and so the vice mayors have actively supported us in identifying suitable sites for a One Planet Living Community in the area. Two sites are under active consideration. London's Mayor Ken Livingstone has also pledged his support for the One Planet Living Community to the Mayor of Shanghai Han Zheng in a letter and when the two men met in Shanghai in April 2006.

Potential sites in Beijing are harder to find, but the Chinese would like to further explore the opportunities for One Planet Living in the capital city. They aim to start work on the first One Planet Living Community in China in 2007.

border

Industries, Universities and Local Governments Team Up to Turn Waste Into Watts
Source: GreenBiz.com
watts

FRANKFORT, Ind., Jan. 25, 2007 - Industrial and farm waste soon may supply electricity for thousands of people because of an economic development collaboration of experts from Purdue University, industry, and city and county governments.

To make this a reality and to curb natural gas and petroleum use, planners and scientists from Purdue, central Indiana's Clinton County and city of Frankfort, and industries Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM) and Indiana Clean Energy LLC (ICE) are joining forces to use waste to produce methane for conversion to electricity. Two separate facilities will be built - one for industrial waste conversion and another for hog waste - with the goal of having plants in operation by spring 2008.

"We're bringing together pieces of industry and agriculture to optimize the energy potential in waste," said Ron Turco, Purdue environmental microbiologist. "We want this project located in an area that takes full advantage of the available waste generated by the area's industrial base."

The center of the industrial waste-to-energy part of the project will be the Clinton County Industrial Park, located west of Frankfort and east of Interstate 65. ADM and ICE are among companies located in the park and participating in plans for the facility. The planners anticipate that the project will entice more industry to the area, spurring economic growth.

The overall plan is designed to contribute to gaining energy independence from non-renewable fossil fuel, providing an economic development platform, and creating teaching and research opportunities. One facility would convert food and plant waste into methane. A second facility, which would convert hog manure into methane, would be at another site centrally located to existing hog farms. The methane generated at the facilities would be used to produce electricity.

"These projects will change wastes into value-added products," said Gina Sheets, Clinton County economic development director. "It will bring together different manufacturers and producers and improve their competitiveness by reducing their costs for energy and for waste disposal."

 

Turco and Larry Nies, a Purdue civil engineer, are helping Sheets and other Clinton County and Frankfort city officials develop a long-range plan that considers the most efficient use of waste to produce the largest possible amount of sustainable energy. Nies, Turco and Sheets believe that the innovative energy-producing operations will encourage industrial expansion in the area.

"This is industrial symbiosis, meaning all the businesses in the area are in this together to find better energy sources," Nies said. "Some companies in the park have high organic waste to make methane. Indiana Clean Energy has excess heat to activate the microbes used to break down the waste. ADM has vegetable oil that can be used for biodiesel, with the remainder used in waste conversion.

"When you have a finite resource like petroleum and natural gas, you have to look at alternative fuel, which is one thing this plan does. In addition, changing waste into energy for homes, businesses and farms is stewardship for the environment. Throwing away waste that has value is a waste; it harms the environment and ignores a valuable resource."

The Clinton County/Frankfort plan would locate a biorefinery for converting ADM, ICE and other waste from industry into methane on five acres in the industrial park at a cost of about $12.5 million. The facility for converting hog waste will cost about $5.5 million.

A public/private partnership is contemplated to finance the cost. County officials also are seeking grant money from various sources that fund economic development and energy alternatives plans.

Sheets' office is taking proposals from private companies interested in owning waste-to-wattage operations. Nies and Turco are advising city and county officials on which of the proposals is most viable for meeting the project's objectives of sustainable energy sources, economic development, education and research.

A 2.5-mile pipeline will carry waste from the swine facilities to the conversion plant. One of the hog farms has about 6,900 pigs and the other has about 14,000.

Eventually it would be in the interest of agriculture and the environment for farmers to develop waste conversion facilities on their own properties, Nies said.

"If the energy is generated immediately rather than transported to a conversion plant, producing the energy would be less expensive and the power could be transferred into the electric grid immediately," Nies said of the European individual energy conversion operations. "Distributed energy production also would make it possible to isolate and maintain portions of the grid in the event of a power outage."

Although converting waste to energy is a novel idea in the United States, parts of Europe have been doing this for quite awhile, Turco said. The Netherlands, in particular, uses conversion facilities because access to cheap fossil fuel and hydroelectric power is lacking. That country also has strict rules about disposal of human and animal waste.

The waste-to-energy facilities in Europe are mainly the individual type that Nies recommends. The waste conversion facilities in Clinton County will be large, centralized regional energy sources. The strategy of companies and farms trading waste for energy is being negotiated.

The Clinton County project will help teach people in the United States about alternatives to fossil fuel, which can't be replaced once depleted, Turco said.

"We need to change people's mindset about waste and about fuel sources," he said. "We want these waste conversion facilities to be in place, not just to provide alternative fuel, but also so we can train students in this technology and to conduct further research on using different sources for energy supplies."

border

Study Forecasts Explosive Growth in Voluntary Carbon Offsets Market
Source: GreenBiz.com
PICTURE

LONDON, Dec. 5, 2006 - Voluntary carbon markets are growing at breakneck pace, but could be stymied by a lack of credibility and other factors, according to a new report.
However, according to Voluntary Carbon Offsets Market: Outlook 2007, published by ICF International, the voluntary carbon offsets market is still quite small compared to the market for project offsets that companies can use for compliance purposes under the Kyoto Protocol.

The World Bank estimates that in 2005 the market for voluntary carbon offsets made up less than 10 million metric tons (Mt) of CO2e, or less than 1 percent of global carbon market transactions and less than 1 percent of the total market value of US$11 million. The International Emissions Trading Association and World Bank estimate that the market for carbon credits has increased to US$ 2.3 billion in the first nine months of 2006 and that the overall carbon market is now worth more than US$21.5 billion.

 

The market is experiencing significant growth as companies not subject to caps on carbon emissions decide voluntarily to offset some or all of their emissions from a variety of sources directly or indirectly related to their business activities. A variety of obstacles could, however, impede the market's future growth.
"To continue its recent explosive growth, the voluntary carbon market must decisively address the significant persistent challenges of credibility, fragmentation, and overlap with the mandatory carbon emissions market," said Eric Lounsbury, carbon market analyst in ICF's London Office.

"The emerging standards for project development and verification are a positive sign that the voluntary market is ready to take the next step in its maturation and development. The market will, however, need to adapt to meet increased stakeholder expectations on environmental integrity and to maintain its niche alongside the market for Kyoto-compliant carbon credits."

"Our analysis examines several scenarios for the evolution of the market for voluntary carbon offsets, and our base case forecasts global demand of around 400 Mt of CO2e per year by 2010," said Abyd Karmali, managing director for ICF's European operations. “Market drivers among the different categories of buyers are diverse and include reputation, experience, and principle. Some companies not subject to caps are low emitters and face inherently high costs of reducing emissions, but nevertheless wish to build a reputation for environmental stewardship and are choosing offsetting as one of the components in their climate strategy. Others recognize that participating in voluntary carbon markets is excellent preparation for future life under a mandatory cap-and-trade scheme. Some companies that have begun to use offsets are doing so based on the principle that it is a means of sharing the responsibility for managing emissions between producers and consumers. We see rapid growth in each segment.”


Page 4 of 7 <<

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright (C)2002 UNESCAP | Legal Notice